Joseph Pearce,
Small is Still Beautiful: Economics as if Families Mattered
(Intercollegiate Studies Institute, 2006).
More
than thirty years after Small is
Beautiful, Joseph Pearce’s Small is
Still Beautiful is at once an introduction, a commentary and an update to
E. F. Schumacher’s work. While much has changed in the decades since
Schumacher’s classic, Pearce demonstrates that his message remains as relevant
as ever. Helpfully, Pearce makes plentiful use of quotations from Schumacher,
as well as his influences and those influenced by him. Pearce is noted for his
literary biographies, and while this work is clearly not biographical in
nature, he brings in key aspects of Schumacher’s life: from his studies under
John Maynard Keynes, to Gandhi and Buddhism, to the Catholic social doctrine
that ultimately led to his conversion to Catholicism.
Pearce’s
book is divided into five parts. “At What Price Growth” focuses on the basic
inconsistencies of contemporary economics and the drive toward continual
growth. Then, in “Economics and the Soul” he explores the relationship between
conventional economics, free trade, and globalism, through to materialism and
consumerism. Next, in “Size Matters”, he deals with alternatives to economies of
scale. “Grounded in the Land” focuses on the relationship between economics,
the environment, agriculture, and technology. Finally, “Living Legacy” looks at
the practicalities of a human-scale economy, and what steps need to be taken to
get there. A recurring theme in Pearce’s book is that, while the contemporary
drive toward “giantism” provides a surface appearance of prosperity for those
who reap its benefits, it also nicks away at the virtues and cultural
dispositions needed to undergird society itself.
Agriculture
and the environment take on a special significance for Pearce, as areas where
the giantist economy is especially taxing, and this runs throughout the book,
not just the chapters specifically dedicated to these topics. Due to the
endless drive for more efficient technology that has exploded since
Schumacher’s time, the environmental effects (and, in turn, the effects on
rural parts of poorer countries) have become more pertinent to the economic
discussion. This is probably most clear in Pearce’s sharp criticism of the
failure of the United States to ratify the Kyoto treaty, and the overall stance
of the US as the largest consumer and polluter in the world. That Pearce
continues Schumacher’s criticism of the United States in the first part of his book
makes this a tough read, even for a sympathetic American. For the reality of
the situation is that we in the US are accustomed to reaping the material
benefits of a global economy which favors giantism. But, as Pearce argues,
reality is quickly becoming a facade: “Reality is being replaced by virtual
reality. The real is being sacrificed to the sub-real. How can humanity address
the urgent problems confronting the real world when it is being simultaneously
stimulated and stupefied by electronic fantasies?” (xvii).
When
it comes to the environment and usage of land, Pearce echoes Schumacher’s
threefold hierarchy, emphasizing health, beauty, and permanence: “[Agriculture]
should keep us in touch with living nature, of which we are and remain a highly
vulnerable part; it should provide expression for our creativity, enabling us
to ennoble our wider habitat; and it should bring forth the foodstuffs and
other materials needed for a becoming existence” (166). In Schumacher’s view,
the first two goals should naturally lead to the third result. The problem with
today’s approach to agriculture and technology is that it places significance
only on the productive aspect, which causes both the environment and humanity
to suffer. More and more people turn away from the land to move to the cities
in order to find employment (while replacing the natural beauty they have lost
with artificial leisure activities). Meanwhile the rich flee to the suburbs, or
even further out into the country, leaving greater poverty behind them. Of
course, compounding this human problem are the greater effects that this
emphasis has on the land itself. Pearce discusses the harmful effects of the
overuse of chemicals and antibiotics in farming, genetically modified organisms
(GMOs), and other technologies that are having significant impacts on both
plant and animal life. Pearce uses the effects on farmland bird and butterfly
populations as examples: now we might add the mysterious decline of bees as an
even more troubling effect.
Pearce
also points to some positive signs that have emerged in the decades since the
publication of Small
is Beautiful, particularly in the chapters dedicated to “small beer,”
organic farming, and cooperatives. Indeed, the proliferation of micro-breweries—and
now nano-breweries, and smaller producers of wine, cider, mead and pretty much
any sort of alcohol—has grown at an even faster pace in the ten years since
Pearce was writing: these have not only exploded in the Great Britain of Pearce
and Schumacher’s focus, but also in the US. The same holds true for the organic
farming movement. Pearce notes that, at its then-current pace, 30% of
agricultural land in Europe would have been farmed organically by 2010 (205).
While that plateau may not have been reached and there remains a long way to go
where both business and government are concerned (issues such as labeling and
regulation of GMOs come to mind), the demand for organic goods has also grown
in the United States, with most major supermarkets now stocking organic lines.
One
of the most curious things about Small
is Still Beautiful is that Pearce’s subtitle is “Economics as if
Families Mattered,” in homage to Schumacher’s “Economics as if People
Mattered.” This is an interesting change because, apart from a brief discussion
in the introduction, Pearce rarely mentions the family, and on a cursory
reading there is no discernible reason why his emphases would amount to a more
familial focus than Schumacher’s original work. I believe that the concluding
chapters may shed some light on this. Pearce considers a key element to
recovery from giantism to be an emphasis on philosophy. He writes that
Schumacher criticized the modern study of science as “know-how” without the
benefit of wisdom, leading us into the errors of economic Darwinism (enshrined
in different ways in both Marxism and capitalism), relativism, and positivism—all
ultimately variations on the sort of self-centeredness that has caused the
problems discussed. Pearce’s concluding chapter is a discussion of the virtues needed
to combat this selfish materialism.
The surest antidote to this selfishness and
the best source for the needed wisdom to grow in these virtues surely lies with
the family. If we assume that Pearce’s audience is of a more religious and
traditional bent, which has nonetheless, for a variety of reasons, been duped
into the mentality of giantism, then the family may be precisely the avenue
which will give us the courage to fight for these issues. There is a long list
of issues for which traditional Christians are on the front lines in the name
of human dignity and the family. As Pearce puts it, “Families teach us to be
selfless and to sacrifice ourselves for others. It is these very virtues that
are necessary for the practice of the economic and political virtues advocated
in [Schumacher’s] work” (xvi). The centrality of the family thus seems crucial
to the renewal of the movement in favor of the small and beautiful.
Michael Roesch is a 2008 John Paul II Institute MTS graduate, and
vice-chancellor of the Catholic Diocese of Evansville, Indiana.
Keep reading! Click here
for a review of Wendell Berry’s A
World Lost.
Michael Roesch, a graduate of the John Paul II Institute and the University of Notre Dame, is Administrative Specialist at the Saint John Paul II National Shrine. He resides with his wife in McLean, Virginia.