Your web browser is out of date. Update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on this site.

Update your browser
Jean-François Millet, The Angelus

It's the Children Who Make It All Get Done

Issue Two / 2017

Charles Péguy

This is an excerpt from Charles Péguy’s The Portal of the Mystery of Hope (Trans. David Louis Schindler, Jr. [Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1986]: 15‒22). It is published here with permission and available for purchase in its entirety on the publisher’s webpage. Our “All You Who Labor” issue featured an excerpt from this same work of Péguy’s: “Finding the Eternal in Our Daily Toil.”

The Portal of the Mystery of Hope, first published in 1912, is Charles Péguy’s most famous prose-poem. Going through over sixty editions in the last hundred years, it gives voice to the French socialist’s profound conversion to the Catholic faith, anchored in a vision that married eschatological vision with a deep sense of social realities. For Péguy,“the little girl Hope” is the most dynamic of the three virtues, enabling Faith and Charity to reach those parts of the humanity which a merciful God desires to plumb. The virtue of hope was of especial relevance to Péguy himself, whose personal circumstances prevented him from receiving the very sacraments around which his poetic vision revolved. Few poets have meditated so deeply on the meaning of human work, and he remains the poet of the disenfranchised and the dispossessed: those who might be tempted to despair at the futility of everything they do.

What is above everything.

God’s blessing, which is on his house and on his ancestors.

The grace of God, which is worth more than anything.

He can be sure of this.

Which is on the poor man and on the working man.

And on him who raises his children well.

He can be sure of this.

Because God promised it.

And because he is supremely faithful in his promises.

His three children who are growing so much.

Provided they don’t get sick.

And who will certainly be bigger than he is.

(How proud he is of this in his heart.)

And his two boys will be awfully strong.

His two boys will replace him, his children will take his place on earth.

When he is no longer here.

His place in the parish and his place in the forest.

His place in the church and his place in the house.

His place in the town and his place in the vineyard.

And on the plains and on the hill and in the valley.

His place in Christianity. After all.

His place as a man and his place as Christian.

His place as parishioner, his place as worker.

His place as farmer.

His place as father.

His place as a son of Lorraine and of France.

Because these are the places, great God, that must be taken.

All of this must go on.

When he is no longer here as he is now.

If not get better.

The work around the farm must go on.

And the vine and the wheat and the harvest and the vintage.

And the tilling of the soil.

And the pasturing of the animals.

When he is no longer here as he is now.

If not get better.

Christianity must go on.

The Church militant.

And for that you need Christians.


France and Lorraine must go on.

Long after he’s gone.

As well as they are now.

If not better.

He thinks tenderly of the time when he will be no longer and his

children will take his place.

On earth.

Before God.

Of that time when he will be no longer and when his children will be.

And when they say his name in town, when they talk about him, when

his name gets brought up, at some chance remark, it will no

longer be him that they talk about but his sons.

All together, it will be him and it will not be him, since it will be his


It will be his name and it will no longer be and it will not be his

name, since it will be (will have become) his sons’ name.

And he is proud of it in his heart and he thinks about it with such


That he will no longer be himself but his sons.

And that his name will no longer be his name but his sons’ name.

That his name will no longer be at his service but at his sons’ service.

Who will bear the name honestly before God.

Openly and proudly.

As he does.

Better than he.

And when they say his name, it’s his son they’ll be calling, it’s his son

they’ll be talking about.

He’ll have long been in the cemetery.

Around the church.

He, that is, his body.

Side by side with his fathers and the fathers of his fathers.

Lined up with them.

With his father and his grandfather that he knew.

And with everyone else, all those that he didn’t know.

All the men and women of his lineage.

All the old men and all the old women.

His ancestors and forefathers.

And his foremothers.

As many of them as there have been since the parish was founded.

By some founding saint.

Sent by Jesus.

His body, because his soul he will have a long time ago.

Commended to God.

Putting it under the protection of his patron saints.

He will sleep, his body will thus rest.

Among his own, (awaiting his own).

Awaiting the resurrection of the body.

Until the resurrection of the body his body will thus rest.

He thinks tenderly of the time when he will no longer be needed.

And when things will go on all the same.

Because there will be others.

Who will bear the same responsibilities.

And who will perhaps, and will undoubtedly, bear them better.

He thinks tenderly of the time when he will be no longer.

Because you can’t be forever, can you.

You can’t be and have been.

And when everything will go on all the same.

When they will not go any worse.

On the contrary.

When things will only get better.

On the contrary.

Because his children will be there, for a while.

His children will do better than he, of course.

And the world will go better.


He’s not jealous of it.

On the contrary.

Nor for having come to the world, as he did, in an ungrateful time.

And to have no doubt prepared for his sons a time that is perhaps less


What madman would be jealous of his sons and of the sons of his sons.

Doesn’t he work solely for his children.

He thinks tenderly of the time when people will scarcely ever think of

him except because of his children.

(If they only think about him occasionally. Rarely.)

When his name resounds (warmly) in town, it’ll be because someone is

calling his son Marcel or his son Pierre.

It’ll be because someone needs his son Marcel or his son Pierre.

And is calling them, happy to see them. And is looking for them.

Because it’s they who will rule then and who will bear the name.

It’s they who will rule with their peers, those from the same generation.

It’s they who will reign on the face of the earth.

Perhaps for some time still, an old man who remembers

Will say.

Those two Sévin boys are good boys.

It’s not surprising.

It runs in the family.

Their father was such a good man.

And after a while the young will repeat with confidence:

The old man was such a good man.

But already they’ll know nothing about it.

They’ll no longer know then, and the comment itself, the very remark

will disappear.

He thinks tenderly about the time when he will no longer be even a


It’s to this end, it’s for this that he works, because doesn’t one always

work for one’s children.

He’ll be nothing but a corpse in six feet of earth under six feet of earth

under a cross.

But his children will be.

He tenderly greets the new time when he will be no longer.

When he will have ceased to be.

When his children will be.

The reign of his children.

He thinks tenderly of the time that will no longer be his time.

But his children’s time.

His children’s reign (of time) on earth.

In that time, when they say The Sévins it won’t be he but they.

Nothing more, without explanation.

His children will bear the name Sévin.

Or the name Chénin, or the name Jouffin, or Damrémont, or any

other name from Lorraine.

Any other Christian name, or French name, any name from Lorraine.

At the thought of his children who will have become men and women.

At the thought of his children’s time, of his children’s reign

On earth,

In their turn,

A tenderness, a warmth, a pride swells in his breast.

(My God, could that be Pride

But God will forgive him.)

How strong and brave his sons will be in the forest, great God.

Boys as solid as oaks

In the forest when the winter wind blows.

The bitter north wind.

That will cut to their bones.

And make icicles in their beards.

He laughs when he thinks what they’ll look like.

He laughs to himself and perhaps even openly.

Out loud.

When he thinks what they’ll look like when they have beards.

And he thinks tenderly about his daughter who will be such a good


Because she’ll certainly be like her mother.

As for him, it’s understood, he’ll be no longer.

He’ll have lost his taste for bread.

But there will be others, great God there will be others,

One must hope,

Who already know the taste for bread and who will know how to bite

into a good crust of bread.

Who will eat heartily.

Their daily bread.

Who will eat heartily their daily bread and their eternal bread.

(They’ll manage very well without him, and he’ll no longer sit at table,

because one must get up from the table when the newcomers

arrive and nudge one aside.)

There will be others—his children who will live and who will die

after him if all proceeds in the right order.

And whom he’ll see again in heaven.


And his wife who stayed home today.

But who otherwise usually goes to the fields too.

Who is such a good homemaker.

And such a good Christian.

Would she be as willing to work.

And do the housework.

If she weren’t working for her children.

Thus, without exception, all the world works for the little girl hope.

All that we do we do for children.

And it’s the children who make it all get done.

All that we do.

As if they led us by the hand.

Thus all we do, everything that everyone does is done for the sake of the little girl hope.

Charles Péguy (1873-1914) was a notable French poet, essayist and editor.

Keep reading! The next article in this issue is, In Search of the Household by John Cuddeback.

Recommended Reading

Santiago Rusiñol, "Romantic Novel" (detail)

The Difference Between Things and Devices

Albert Borgmann

In the common view, technological progress is seen as a more or less gradual and straightforward succession of lesser by better implements. The wood-burning stove yields to the coal-fired central plant with heat distribution by convection, which in turn gives way to a plant fueled by natural gas and heating through forced air, and so on. To bring the distinctiveness of availability into relief we must turn to the distinction between things and devices.

Read Full Article
Photograph by Abhisek Sarda

The Participation of Making

David Henderson

Gregory of Nyssa’s treatise On the Making of Man is organized around a radical central claim, an analogy of such scope and implication as to be altogether unimaginable to the ancient pagan world. In a passage reflecting on the “counsel” or “wisdom” of creation, Gregory draws a remarkable line of comparison between what he describes as the “royal” character of the human soul and the free decision of God to create.

Read Full Article
Thomas Cole, "The Course of Empire"

What Does It Take To Be "A People"?

Augustine of Hippo

The Sack of Rome by the Visigoths in 410 left a once-proud and powerful empire reeling. How could “the Eternal City” fall to barbarian invaders, ransacking her ancient streets, plundering her priceless treasures? Some Romans blamed Christianity: had Rome not abandoned her ancestral gods, she would have been spared. St. Augustine of Hippo argued otherwise. In The City of God (426), he mounts a spirited defense of Christianity and its salutary effects on Rome.

Read Full Article
Humanum: Issues in Family, Culture & Science
Pontifical John Paul II Institute for Studies on Marriage and Family
620 Michigan Ave. N.E. (McGivney Hall)
Washington, DC 20064